Search results for "Legal Decisions"

showing 3 items of 3 documents

Combined Anchoring: Prosecution and defense claims as sequential anchors in the courtroom

2021

Purpose When making judgements under uncertainty not only lay people but also professional judges often rely on heuristics like a numerical anchor (e.g., a numerical sentencing demand) to generate a numerical response. As the prosecution has the privilege to present its demand first, some scholars have speculated about an anchoring���based unfair disadvantage for the defence (who has the last albeit less effective word in court). Despite the plausibility of this reasoning, it is based on a hitherto untested assumption that the first of two sequential anchors exerts a greater influence on a later judgement (a primacy effect). We argue that it is also conceivable that the last word in court h…

Strafrecht und Verbrechensbekämpfunglegal decisionsprimacyAnchoringsentencingPathology and Forensic Medicine345anchoringanchor effectLaw150 PsychologieLegal DecisionsCriminal lawddc:345Psychology150 PsychologyApplied Psychologycriminal law
researchProduct

Cuarta revolución industrial (4.0.) o ciberindustria en el proceso penal: revolución digital, inteligencia artificial y el camino hacia la robotizaci…

2019

El objetivo de este trabajo es analizar la irrupción de la cuarta revolución industrial (4.0.) y sus consecuencias, especialmente la inteligencia artificial, en la justicia en general, y en la penal en particular. La incorporación de sistemas de expertos, algoritmos y modelos computacionales en el asesoramiento, predicción y toma de decisiones judiciales es ya una realidad. Se avizora una inquietante situación con la posibilidad de la robotización judicial o el juez robot (máquina inteligente) en sustitución del juez persona, que crea una cognición artificial que plantea dudas acerca de la individualización de la pena, de la posible responsabilidad de la máquina, la sensibilidad de víctimas…

Welfare economicsPolitical scienceLegal DecisionsComputingMilieux_LEGALASPECTSOFCOMPUTINGGeneral MedicineIndustrial RevolutionEconomic JusticeDret penalCriminal justiceRevista Jurídica Digital UANDES
researchProduct

Statistical Adhockeries Are No Criteria for Legal Decisions—The Case of the Expert Medical Report on the Assessment of Urine Specimens Collected Amon…

2019

biologyAthletesGeneral CommentaryApplied psychologylcsh:HM401-1281General Social SciencesMedical reportCoherence (statistics)biology.organism_classificationcoherencelcsh:Sociology (General)SociologyplausibilityLegal Decisionsexpertisestatistical approachBayesian (subjective) probabilityPsychologyFrontiers in Sociology
researchProduct